Legal Opinion

F. E. Myers & Bros. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 24, 1947No. Civ. No. 2625PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The original complaint was brought to declare Mann Patent No. 2,257,507 and Mann Patent No. 2,375,571 invalid and not infringed. Defendant’s original answer contained a denial of invalidity, admitted that a controversy existed as to the validity of claims 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 27, 29 and 30 of Patent No. 2,257,-507 and claims 2 and 3 of Patent No. 2,375,571 and as to the infringement by the plaintiff; and a denial of any charge of infringement as to the other claims of the two patents. The answer also contained a counterclaim alleging infringement…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  2. Hanes Dye & Finishing Co. v. Caisson Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1970
  3. International Minerals & Chemicals Corp. v. Golding-Keene Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1958
  4. Kendall Co. v. Tetley Tea Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API