Legal Opinion

W.M.F. v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 5, 1986No. A-1330PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

This is an appeal by W.M.F., a minor, from an order by Superior Court Judge Karl Johnstone, finding W.M.F. not to be amenable to treatment as a juvenile and *1299waiving children’s court jurisdiction over W.M.F. W.M.F. contends that use of the “preponderance of the evidence” standard as the standard of proof in a waiver hearing to show nonamenability to treatment of a juvenile violates due process. She also contends that the court abused its discretion in denying a one-year postponement of the phase of the waiver hearing in which the court was to decide amenability to treatment.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. A.S.W. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. R.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  3. State v. LaddCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  4. State v. RiccioSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. C.D., a Minor v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API