W.M.F. v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
This is an appeal by W.M.F., a minor, from an order by Superior Court Judge Karl Johnstone, finding W.M.F. not to be amenable to treatment as a juvenile and *1299waiving children’s court jurisdiction over W.M.F. W.M.F. contends that use of the “preponderance of the evidence” standard as the standard of proof in a waiver hearing to show nonamenability to treatment of a juvenile violates due process. She also contends that the court abused its discretion in denying a one-year postponement of the phase of the waiver hearing in which the court was to decide amenability to treatment.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- A.S.W. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- R.H. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
- State v. LaddCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
- State v. RiccioSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- C.D., a Minor v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.