Hooven & Allison Co. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In the case at bar, this court must first decide whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars the commissioner from imposing an ad valorem property tax upon imported raw goods stored by Hooven in its warehouse.
In Montana v. United States (1979), 440 U.S. 147, the United States Supreme Court clearly set forth the operational features of the interrelated doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court therein declared:
“* * * Under res judicata, a final judgment on the merits bars further claims by parties or their privies based on the same cause of action. * * * Under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Board of Education of Dublin School District v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Dublin School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Julia Realty, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.