Legal Opinion
Limbach v. Hooven & Allison Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 18, 1984No. 83-96PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U. S. 652 (1945) (Hooven I), this Court passed upon the constitutionality of Ohio’s application of a nondiscriminatory ad valorem personal property tax to imported fibers still in their original packages. The result there was unfavorable to the State. In this case, the Tax Commissioner of Ohio asks us to sustain the application of the same nondiscriminatory ad valorem personal property tax to like fibers, still in their original packages, imported by the same manufacturer. The case thus presents, primarily, an issue of preclusion framed in terms of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- New Hampshire Hemp Council, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company v. The Assiniboine And Sioux Tribes Of The Fort Peck ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.