Fidtler v. Rundle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH S. LORD, III, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this pro se action seeks to recover money damages for the “dispossession of a constitutional right.” He argues that the defendant, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford, Pa., has forced him into “involuntary servitude” in violation of the Thirteenth Amendment by requiring him to perform physical labor while a prisoner. Plaintiff also alleges that the work he is required to do in the prison laundry, a “sweat box,” must be performed “without adequate protection for health or injury to the person.”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pugliano v. StaziakDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Robert Draper v. B. J. Rhay, as Superintendent of Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States ex rel. Hoge v. BolsingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States Ex Rel. Hoge v. BolsingerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lingo v. BooneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
- Woodall v. PartillaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Farinaro v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Iqbal Jafree v. ScottDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974