Legal Opinion
Pugliano v. Staziak
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 30, 1964No. Civ. A. 64-78PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
On January 29, 1964, this member of the court granted plaintiff’s petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and directed the filing of his complaint. The complaint alleges that defendants, Staziak, Pollice and Monti, acting under color of law in their capacities as police officers of the City of Pittsburgh, formed a conspiracy with defendant, Sarnie (a private individual), to deprive Pugliano of his constitutional rights when the said police officers “de-liberty [sic] induced Mr. Sarnie to give false evidence against the plaintiff causing him to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- R. W. Agnew v. City of Compton, a Municipal Corporation H. R. Lindemulder and Frank SpragueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Joseph Moss v. Albert H. HornigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- William L. Hanna v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Negrich v. HohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Joseph Carl Brown, Jr. v. Richard P. Joseph, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Black v. BayerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- U. S. Ex Rel. Brzozowski v. RandallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.