Holmes, Woods & Diggs, v. Laurie Gentry

OPINION

Opinion By

Justice RICHTER.

This is an interlocutory appeal from a trial court’s order denying a motion to enforce an arbitration clause. In a single issue, appellant Holmes, Woods & Diggs (the “Firm”) contends the trial court erred because the Firm did not waive its right to arbitration. We conclude the Firm’s arguments are without merit and affirm the trial court’s order.

Background

In December 2003, Laurie Gentry retained the Firm to represent her in a family law matter. Gentry and the Firm executed a fee agreement in connection with the representation. The fee agreement contains an…