McDaniel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, HERVEY and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.
This is a probation revocation case. Before the revocation hearing, appellant’s counsel filed a “Motion for Examination *706Regarding Ineompetency,” asserting there was “an issue” regarding appellant’s competency and requesting appointment of an expert for competency testing. The question presented is whether the trial court was, on the basis of that motion, required to hold a competency inquiry prior to the revocation hearing.1 We hold that a trial judge need not perform a “competency inquiry” unless…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Granados v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by267 opinions
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Montoya v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- In Re Commitment of FisherTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- LaHood v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.