Legal Opinion

State v. Moorman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1996No. 96-051PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

Martin Moorman was convicted and sentenced by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, for robbery and was designated a dangerous offender. Moorman contested his dangerous offender designation in a petition for post-conviction relief, which the District Court denied. Moorman appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

The following dispositive issues are raised on appeal:

1. Did the District Court properly apply the procedural bar rule of § 46-21-105(2), MCA, to dismiss Moorman’s petition for post-conviction relief?

2. Did the District Court possess…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. HatfieldMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. OhnmachtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. HuynhColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Peña v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GoebelMontana Supreme Court · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API