Legal Opinion

State v. Finley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02-188PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Darnel Felix Finley (Finley) appeals the re-revocation of his suspended sentence by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, which occurred three months after Finley’s initial revocation proceedings were declared void under the authority of State u. Goebel, 2001 MT 73, 305 Mont. 53, 31 P.3d 335, and State v. Giddings, 2001 MT 76, 305 Mont. 74, 29 P.3d 475. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We frame the issues for appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Does this Court have jurisdiction to hear Finley’s claim that the

District Court lacked jurisdiction to conduct re-revocation proceedings?…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re the Mental Health of K.G.F.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Park v. Montana Sixth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. TriplettMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. CharlieMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McDaniel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API