Legal Opinion

Muntzing v. Harwood

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1913No. 3680PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Washington District Court. How. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Hurlbut, J.,

rendered the opinion of the court.

July 23, 1909, appellee, as plaintiff, instituted an action against appellant to quiet title to land in Washington county. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and the cause is here hy proper appeal.

Complaint was in usual form, to which defendant filed an answer containing a general denial, also a defense based upon a treasurer’s tax deed alleged to have been duly recorded. To this answer plaintiff replied, denying defendant’s title, and alleging that the tax deed was void on its face for a number of reasons therein set forth.

Appellant contends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wall v. MagnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. BenderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Gage v. CantwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Lambert v. ShumwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Weston v. EsteySupreme Court of Colorado · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. RohanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Gibson v. Interior Realty & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Glover v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API