Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1913No. 2007PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted as an accomplice to horse-theft and given the lowest penalty.

The horse was charged to have been stolen by Monroe Adams. Adams testified against appellant and was sufficiently corroborated. The evidence was sufficient to establish that the day of the night of the theft appellant and Adams were together in appellant’s field, where they had some conversation in the presence and in connection with others then present, about going to the Dallas Fair. When Adams got ready to leave and started, appellant accompanied him some distance from these others who…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Elizando v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Holliday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. McKinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Fields v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API