Legal Opinion

Miller v. Crosson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1938No. 30223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an action to recover from a sheriff and his bonding company for damages occasioned by the loss alleged incident to an execution issued to him as such officer. This case was previously before this court. Miller v., Crosson, 131 Neb. 88, 267 N. W. 145. Those desiring an extended statement of facts are referred to that opinion. It seems sufficient now to state that an execution was *893caused to issue to the sheriff under which he levied upon a car. A third party claimed ownership of the car, and the sheriff released it upon demand and evidence of ownership. This case was also heard twice by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ashland Land & Live-Stock Co. v. MayNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Allender v. Chicago & NorthWestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Blaha v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Peterson v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wessel v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pruitt v. Lincoln City LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hahn v. DoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API