Legal Opinion

United States v. Richards

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1935No. 6905PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

As in Bryant Paper Co. v. Holden, 63 F.(2d) 370, we are again pressed for decision as to whether a claim for refund of a tax has been presented by the taxpayer in such form as to be subject to amendment after a claim wholly new would be barred by limitation. When the Bryant Paper Co. Case was argued, the problem had not yet been illuminated by the substantially contemporaneous decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co., 288 U. S. 62, 53 S. Ct. 278, 282, 77 L. Ed. 619, United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co., 288 U. S. 73, 53 S. Ct. 283, 285,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. Henry Prentiss & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Factors & Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Bryant Paper Co. v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Kales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  4. Levitsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  5. Edwards v. MalleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API