Bronx Savings Bank v. Conduff
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMODY, Justice.
This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Conduff cross-claimed against the defendants Dalton on the Daltons’ promise to assume the mortgage. The Daltons cross-claimed against Conduff for cancellation of the conveyance from Con-duff to them on the ground of Mr. Dalton’s infancy at the time of the conveyance. The trial court, sitting without a jury, determined the issues in favor of the plaintiff on its complaint, and in favor of the defendant Conduff on the cross-claims, holding that Dalton had ratified the conveyance, and the Daltons appeal.
On December 14,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rubin v. StrandbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Lee v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Farnum v. O'NeillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- Madrid v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003