Legal Opinion

Bronx Savings Bank v. Conduff

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1967No. 8217PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

This was a suit to foreclose a mortgage. Defendant Conduff cross-claimed against the defendants Dalton on the Daltons’ promise to assume the mortgage. The Daltons cross-claimed against Conduff for cancellation of the conveyance from Con-duff to them on the ground of Mr. Dalton’s infancy at the time of the conveyance. The trial court, sitting without a jury, determined the issues in favor of the plaintiff on its complaint, and in favor of the defendant Conduff on the cross-claims, holding that Dalton had ratified the conveyance, and the Daltons appeal.

On December 14,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Hobbs v. Hinton Foundry, Machine & Plumbing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Rubin v. StrandbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lee v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Farnum v. O'NeillCity of New York Municipal Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Madrid v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API