Legal Opinion

Farnum v. O'Neill

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 14, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, David C., J.

This controversy arises out of a contract between an “ inexperienced ” performer (described as “ unfamihar in the details of obtaining engagements ”) and an “ expertly quahfied ” manager.

The agreement bears date July 26, 1928, the defendant at that timo being only nineteen years of age.

From the features of the document one reads its parentage.

Prolific provisions, securing for the plaintiff the exclusive benefit of defendant’s services and his continued right to share in her earnings; also purporting to endow him with an irrevocable extensive power of attorney; and including…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. Municipal Metallic Bed Manufacturing Corp. v. DobbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Taft v. SergeantNew York Supreme Court · 1854

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friedkin v. Harry Walker, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1977
  2. Shelton v. Elite Model Management, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. National Talent Associates, Inc. v. HollandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Bronx Savings Bank v. ConduffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API