Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Korpus

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s affidavit did not verify his cause of action, as required" by Rules of Civil Practice, rule 113. This must be done before defendant is called upon to present any affidavit in opposition. (State Bank v. Mackstein, 123 Misc. 416; Tidewater Oil Sales Corporation v. Pierce, 213 App. Div. 796.)

Upon proper papers a motion for summary judgment may be made under the rule, either in an action “ to recover a debt or liquidated demand,” and this seems to cover an action for services based on a quantum meruit. (Poland Export Corporation v. Marcus, 204 App. Div. 302; Title Guarantee & Trust…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tidewater Oil Sales Corp. v. PierceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Poland Export Corp. v. MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. State Bank v. MacksteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gubin v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API