Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Mackstein

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

The plaintiff sued as the assignee of the Kramerlite Co., Inc., for goods alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants. The defendants interposed a general denial and also a counterclaim. The pleadings are unverified. Upon motion made by plaintiff, defendants who failed to file a bill of particulars were precluded from offering any testimony at the trial on the counterclaim. Thereafter plaintiff moved the court for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, which motion was granted by the trial court. This was clearly error. In order to entitle a party…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Hayward Union High School District v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
  4. Jacobs v. KorpusAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
  5. Mosca v. J. H. Parker-Aeolus, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API