Legal Opinion

Poland Export Corp. v. Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The plaintiff moved for a summary judgment. (Rules of Civil Practice, rule 113.) The learned justice at Special Term denied the motion on the ground that “ there is a real issue between the parties, and that issue has been formulated by the answer.” If the sole question in this case was whether the justice at Special Term had correctly determined that there was a triable issue, we would dismiss the appeal. (Dwan v. Massarene, 199 App. Div. 872, 880.)

There is, however, a more serious objection to this motion, which was not urged before us and presumably not called to the attention of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Ziegler v. Mancuso & Alessio, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Buffalo General Hospital v. SuppaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. PodhorzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Haiss v. SchmuklerNew York Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API