Legal Opinion

State v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1958No. 146PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

By this proceeding the petitioners seek a new trial under the North Carolina Post Conviction Hearing Act, claiming that during imprisonment and trial their fundamental rights under Article I, Sections 11 and 17, Constitution of North Carolina, and under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States had been denied them.

The Post conviction Hearing Act is not a substitute for appeal. It cannot be used to raise the question whether errors were committed in the course of the trial. The inquiry is limited to a determination whether the petitioners were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. GravesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API