Legal Opinion

Northeast Savings, F.A. v. Plymouth Commons Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 14, 1994No. 14731PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

This appeal and cross appeal from a judgment of foreclosure requires us to decide whether the trial court properly: (1) imposed sanctions against the defendants Joan C. Ursini and Plymouth Commons Realty Corporation (Plymouth Realty) because their codefendant, Louis M. Ursini,1 refused to answer questions at his deposition; and (2) denied the plaintiffs motion to strike the defendants’ jury claim. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to strike the jury claim, but that it improperly imposed sanctions against Joan Ursini and Plymouth Realty.

The facts may be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Pavlinko v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Savings Bank of New London v. SantanielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. GolartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. RytmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. 669 Atlantic Street Associates v. Atlantic-Rockland Stamford AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Sovereign Bank v. LicataConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Duart v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API