Gallman v. Pierce
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
LEGGE, District Judge.
This case is presently before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue is whether tenants participating in a subsidized housing program are entitled to a notice of good cause at least thirty days prior to a proposed eviction. For the reasons discussed below, the court concludes that California law requires that landlords who participate in so-called Section 8 existing housing programs must serve their tenants with notices setting forth the grounds for eviction at ieast thirty days prior to any court…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- S.B. Partnership v. GogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Anast v. Commonwealth ApartmentsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Lamlon Development Corp. v. OwensNassau County District Court · 1988
- Horizon Homes of Davenport v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Mitchell v. PooleAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.