Legal Opinion

Gallman v. Pierce

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 18, 1986No. C-84-0006-CALPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEGGE, District Judge.

This case is presently before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. The issue is whether tenants participating in a subsidized housing program are entitled to a notice of good cause at least thirty days prior to a proposed eviction. For the reasons discussed below, the court concludes that California law requires that landlords who participate in so-called Section 8 existing housing programs must serve their tenants with notices setting forth the grounds for eviction at ieast thirty days prior to any court…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. S.B. Partnership v. GogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Anast v. Commonwealth ApartmentsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  3. Lamlon Development Corp. v. OwensNassau County District Court · 1988
  4. Horizon Homes of Davenport v. NunnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. Mitchell v. PooleAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API