Legal Opinion
Anast v. Commonwealth Apartments
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 16, 1997No. 95 C 7032PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, District Judge.
On December 12, 1995, Plaintiff Mary Anast (“Anast”) filed a six-count complaint against Defendants Commonwealth Apartments, A&R Katz Management, Inc., and Lee Rogers. Plaintiff alleges that defendants deprived her of her due process rights, breached their lease agreement, violated the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, the Fair Housing Act and Rehabilitation Act, and intentionally caused plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress. Defendants move this court to dismiss-plaintiffs complaint under Rule 12(b)(1)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prindable v. Association of Apartment Owners of 2987 KalakauaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Cavalieri-Conway v. L. Butterman & AssociatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Villas West II of Willowridge v. McGlothinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ruppel v. RamseyerDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.