Legal Opinion
Watters v. Dairyland Insurance
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1976No. 7887PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas that the following provision in defendant’s auto insurance policy is void as against public policy.
“The term ‘uninsured automobile’ shall not include '* * * án' automobile which is owned by the United States of America, Canada, or a state, or a political subdivision of any such government or an agency of any of the foregoing * *
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The plaintiff, Jack Watters, a resident of Ohio, purchased auto insurance from the defendant company, which was authorized to do business in Ohio. Plaintiff’s auto was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- Curran v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Globe American Casualty Co. v. GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williams v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
- Cropper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1995
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. TroskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- McClellan v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.