Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Trosky
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 2009No. 29A02-0902-CV-148PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Cincinnati Insurance Company appeals from the trial court's order in a declaratory judgment action denying Cincinnati's and State Farm Fire's motions for summary judgment, and granting James and Jan Trosky's motion for summary judgment against Cincinnati and State Farm Fire, and granting Kaitlin Culpepper's eross-motion for partial summary judgment against Cincinnati. Cincinnati raises the following issue for our review: Did the trial court correctly conclude that excess underinsured motorist coverage (UIM coverage) in a personal liability umbrella policy was…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Zurich Insurance v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Young v. Progressive Southeastern Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Quakenbush v. LackeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
- Speer v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SellersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- Cross v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.