Legal Opinion
Laughinghouse v. Risser
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 1992No. 87-4257-RPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This case has been tried before a jury and to the court. It is now before the court upon defendants’ motion for new trial, for alteration or amendment of the judgment and/or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The motion is addressed entirely toward the jury verdict in this case.
Defendants have objected to a response brief plaintiff filed after defendants’ reply brief. Plaintiff did not ask for leave to file the brief, and the brief technically violates the rules of this court. So, the court shall direct the Clerk to strike the brief (Doe. #…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hammond v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Beam v. Concord Hospitality, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Reynolds v. Highland Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. P.B. Hoidale Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Rivera v. RiveraDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.