Nittany Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. College Township
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs’s motions for partial summary judgment and for permanent injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 25 & 28) are each granted in part and denied in part.
I. General Background
On April 11, 2012, plaintiffs Nittany Outdoor Advertising, LLC, and Stephanas Ministries (hereinafter, “Nittany” and “Ministries”) filed a complaint seeking redress of defendant College Township’s (hereinafter, the “Township”) denial of Nittany’s applications to post three billboards bearing the Ministries’s messages along East College Avenue, “the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Adver. Ltd. P'ship v. Pa. Dep't of Transp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Adams Outdoor Adver. Ltd. P'ship v. Pa. Dep't of Transp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Florida Beach Advertising, LLC v. City of Treasure Island, FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
- Picard v. Phoenix Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Picard v. Phoenix Administrators, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.