Legal Opinion
Adams Outdoor Adver. Ltd. P'ship v. Pa. Dep't of Transp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 2018No. 5:17–cv–01253PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership ("Adams"), whose Amended Complaint focused on the Interchange Prohibition,2 challenges the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971, 36 P.S. §§ 2718.101 - 2718.115 (the "Act"). See also Pa. Code §§ 445.1-445.9. On February 9, 2018, this Court dismissed Adams's vagueness challenge regarding the 500-feet spacing requirement in the Interchange Prohibition, as well as Adams's substantive due process and equal protection claims.3 The claims…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Advertising Ltd v. PA Dept of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Kenjoh Outoor, LLC v. MarchbanksDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- White Hat v. LandryDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
- White Hat v. LandryDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020