Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Anderson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

The bill herein was filed for the purpose of enforcing the specific performance of the following written contract :

“Sale Contract.

‘ ‘ This contract made and entered into by Ed G. Schmid, Agents for Ed. Anderson of the first part and Ellsworth Schultz, of the second part: Witnessetli: that party of the first part has sold unto party of the second part, who hereby buys the following described premises:

“’Situated in the Second Civil District of Knox County, Tennessee, and being a certain tract of land containing ten and one-half acres lying on the southern side of Taze-well Pike, improved by a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harris v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Lee v. CherryTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Huffine v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Lawrence v. CockeTennessee Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Byrd v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roberts v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  2. White Motor Corp. v. Nashville White Trucks, Inc. (In Re Nashville White Trucks, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980
  3. Parsons Et Ux. v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kirshner v. FeigenbaumTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Batey v. DH Overmyer Warehouse CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API