Arndt v. Kuhn
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, P. J.
The chancellor dismissed appellants’ bill of review for error apparent on the record. Appellants say the bill should have been sustained. It is necessary to an understanding of the involved issues to detail, to some extent, the proceedings which have been had in this matter.
In September 1954, appellants, as complainants, filed an original bill in Cause No. 12,743 in Jackson County, Mississippi. They later filed two amended bills. The bill, with the amendments, charged that complainants, in December 1949, procured a judgment for $5,000 against defendant Doody in the Circuit Court of Jackson…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bailey's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Regner v. HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Snead v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Commonwealth v. ToebeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Wootton v. PollockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beckett v. HoworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Fondren v. Bank of FranklinMississippi Supreme Court · 1966
- Taylor v. GrissomMississippi Supreme Court · 1957