Legal Opinion

Regner v. Hoover

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1925No. 16751. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The appellant filed a bill in the nature of a bill of review seeking to vacate and set aside a decree pro confesso entered against her in the superior court of Cook county on January 22, 1924, in a cause in which Merritt O. Hoover, her father, was complainant and the appellant, with her husband, Harry Regner, and the Security Bank of Chicago, were defendants. Relief is sought in this bill of review on the ground that there is error apparent on the face of the record and fraud in procuring the decree. The error alleged was, that relief was granted in the decree that was not warranted by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrican v. County of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Vyverberg v. VyverbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Crane Co. v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. French v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Collins v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Ward v. SampsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Harry Alter Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  4. Kurtzon v. KurtzonIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Barzowski v. Highland Park State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API