Legal Opinion

Snead v. Lee

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1928No. 6 Div. 128PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Tbe court below overruled appellant’s demurrer to appellee’s bill of review for alleged error apparent on the face of tbe record affecting the decree in the cause entitled Laura Snead versus Adam Lee-. Appellee’s present bill alleges error in the original cause in the following particulars:(1) The respective interests of the parties in the property ordered to be sold in lieu of partition in' the original cause was not sufficiently alleged.(2) The original complainant, appellant in this cause, was erroneously allowed compensation for improvements made by her upon the common property.(3) The…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dent v. FoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Porter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. McCall v. McCurdySupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Horton v. SledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  5. Taylor v. CrookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Jones v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Matthews v. LytleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Zimmerman v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API