Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Barnhart

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided March 22, 2005No. CIV.A. 04-AP-2154Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY AND TO SUPPLEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

KANE, District Judge.

This social security appeal is before me on Plaintiffs Combined Motions to Supplement the Record and to Compel or Make Findings Pursuant to Rule 36(a) Fed. R.Civ.P. and the Commissioner’s related Motion for Protective Order. Plaintiff contends she was entitled to responses to discovery requests directed to the Commissioner last December, and that the Commissioners’s failure to respond should be deemed an admission under the Rules of Civil Procedure. The information sought related to the Appeals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Viola BROWNING, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. William A. Atteberry v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Gomez v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API