Legal Opinion
National Paintball Supply, Inc. v. Cossio
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-3865PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
By way of the instant motion, Defendants Larry and Marcela Cossio, doing business as National Paintball Association, seek to have the complaint against them dismissed for lack of in personam jurisdiction and/or insufficient venue pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2). Alternatively, defendants ask that this action be transferred for improper venue and convenience to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. For the reasons which follow, the motions shall be denied.
Statement of Facts
Plaintiff, National Paintball Supply, Inc. (“NPS”)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Saint-Gobain Calmar, Inc. v. National Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- ITT Industries, Inc. v. Pacific Employers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Walsh v. Alarm Security Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Resnick v. ManfredyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Hufnagel v. CiamaccoDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.