Legal Opinion

Hufnagel v. Ciamacco

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-00611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is a diversity action wherein Plaintiff Ronni Hufnagel (“Hufnagel”) has brought suit against Defendants DeLena Ciamacco (d/b/a The Friesian Empire and Equine Center) (“Ciamacco”) and Matt Bryner (“Bryner”) alleging breach of contract, negligence and contractual duty to a third party. These claims arise out of Ciamacco’s and Bryner’s1 conduct with regard to the care and training of Hufnagel’s Friesian horses (Docket No. 38 at ¶¶ 4, 19, 21). Hufnagel targets Ciamacco for her alleged failure to properly maintain the horses’…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wall v. Corona Capital, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. BEEMAC, INC. v. REPUBLIC STEELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Centimark Corporation v. Brycen Ribordy and Cherry Coatings Management, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. DEEMAC SERVICES, LLC v. REPUBLIC STEELDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Jesse Raphael v. Hersel H. Gidanian, et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API