Legal Opinion

In re Malcolm

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 4, 1932No. 2941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

For alleged lack of invention over the prior art cited, the tribunals of the United States Patent Office have concurred in rejecting the *1098five claims of appellant’s application for patent upon claimed improvements in music notation.

Claim 9 is selected by appellant as illustrative:

9. Tlie herein described music notation sheet having thereon two pairs of staff lines, one for the treble and one for the bass, numerals 1 to 7, inclusive, for designating the white key notes of each octave and consecutive letters designating the black key notes of each octave, arranged with the characters designating…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rand, McNally & Co. v. Exchange Scrip-Book Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
  2. Johnson v. JohnstonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1894
  3. Benjamin Menu Card Co. v. RandU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ReevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  2. In Re McKeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API