Legal Opinion
Charnes v. DiGiacomo
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 16, 1980No. 79SA218PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dubofsky
The defendant-appellant taxpayer here appeals a trial court order denying his motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued under section 39-21-112(3), C.R.S. 1973 (see p. 11, infra). The Court of Appeals transferred the case to us under section 13-4-102, C.R.S. 1973, because the taxpayer challenges the constitutionality of the subpoena statute. We affirm the trial court’s order.
On October 24, 1978, the Attorney General, on behalf of Alan N. Charnes, the director of the Department of Revenue (plaintiffappellee), filed a motion for a subpoena duces tecum in Denver District Court. The motion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- People v. MarcySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Commonwealth v. BeaufordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- People v. YoungSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.