Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gross v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. Docket Nos. 98045, 98046, 98806, (Calendar Nos. 9-10)Published

1DissentLevin, J.

I agree with the majority that "a part” of the instant causes of action for product design failure did not arise, for venue purposes, in Wayne County on the rationale that the decision to manufacture and market products containing the alleged design defects was necessarily made in Detroit because the World Headquarters of General Motors is located in Detroit. Further discovery, however, may show that the ultimate design decision was made in Detroit.

General Motors contends that the vehicles were designed at its Warren Technical Center in Ma-comb County. McLain contends, with some evidence to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lorencz v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Burns v. RodmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gross v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Raven v. WAYNE CTY. BD. OF COMMRS.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API