Legal Opinion

Burns v. Rodman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1955No. Docket 71, Calendar 46,210PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

On leave granted by the circuit court, plaintiff filed an information in the nature of quo warranto and after a trial now appeals from the judgment of the circuit court. The Information was for the purpose of testing the title to the office of supervisor of the township of Manistique in School-craft county resulting from the spring election of April 6, 1953. Plaintiff Burns and defendant Rod-man were both candidates at that election for the office of supervisor. Plaintiff was a “sticker” candidate. Defendant’s name was printed on the only ticket appearing on the ballot.

The effect of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Morris v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Township of Pontiac v. FeatherstoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Middlebrooks v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Devine v. WonderlichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. REID v. ReidOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Abate v. PscMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API