Legal Opinion

State v. Finical

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 1994No. 69,050PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The State appeals the dismissal of nine indictments in eight separate actions. The eight separate actions were consolidated below for the purposes of the defendants’ motion to dismiss and again for purposes of this appeal. We deny the appeal of the State for reasons set forth in this opinion.

On May 12, 1992, pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3001(2), a petition for a grand jury was filed in the district court of Coffey County. K.S.A. 22-3001(2) permits the electors of a county to petition the court to summon a grand jury. After a petition is filed with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NeerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. State v. Zimmerman & SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Vaughan v. HornamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Neuvert v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Schauf v. Peter Kiewit & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Kansas Baptist Convention v. Mesa Operating Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. UnruhSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API