Legal Opinion
Eastern-Central Motor Carriers Ass'n v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 7, 1944No. 105PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge
Appellants are motor carrier associations who seek to put into effect proposed rate schedules in order to meet *195rail competition. The schedules cover transportation of hard surface floor covering, e. g., linoleum, from points in New England and Middle Atlantic states to various destinations in Middle Western states. The Interstate Commerce Commission, three Commissioners dissenting, rejected the schedules. 34 M. C. C. 641. In so doing it upheld the previous conclusion of its Division 3. 31 M. C. C. 193. A three-judge District Court (28 U. S. C. § 47) sustained the Commission’s decision. 48 F.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- TI ME Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.