Legal Opinion
State v. Monticello Developers, Inc.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1988No. 18S02-8711-CR-1099PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Appellee Monticello Developers, Inc. was tried before a jury, which returned a guilty verdict. The trial court granted Monticello's post-verdict motion for judgment on the evidence and entered judgment for defendant. On the State's appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed because that the trial court had applied an incorrect legal standard in granting judgment on the evidence. It found that the jury's verdict was supported by sufficient evidence, and remanded the case for reinstatement of the jury's verdict. State v. Monticello Developers, Inc. (1987), Ind.App., 502 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Juan M. Garrett v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Taflinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. SpringerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jeffrey A. Cleary v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Damoine Wilcoxson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.