Legal Opinion

Cataldo v. Grappone

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 1977No. 7817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves an alleged easement on the property of the defendants, and a counterclaim for trespass and other damages by the defendants. The trial before a Master (John D. McLaughlin, Esq.) resulted in a recommendation that the plaintiffs had sustained their burden of proving continuous adverse use for the prescriptive period. The court issued a decree in accordance with the master’s recommendation and enjoined the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ use of the right of way. During the course of trial both the defendants and the plaintiffs seasonably excepted to the denial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mary Hitchcock Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Gowen v. SwainSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. Hoban v. BucklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Emery v. Tilo Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  5. Ucietowski v. NovakSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Catalano v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  2. Cote v. EldeenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Ellison v. FellowsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Sandford v. Town of WolfeboroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Hewes v. BrunoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API