Legal Opinion

Furth v. Farkasch

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1927No. 8066PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVickery, J.

This cause comes here on error from the Cleveland Municipal Court. George W. Furth brought an action to recover on a contract in which he set forth that he and Oscar Farkasch entered into an agreement, whereby for a good consideration, a sort of partnership relation was created between them, which permitted Furth to share in the money realized from commissions for the sale of real estate that had been carried into execution by Farkasch. He set up in his statement of claim the agreement and the fact of the amount of money that had been earned by Farkasch .to which he was entitled by virtue of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Summers v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gunsorek v. Heartland BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Miller v. AubleOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. McHugh v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API