Miller v. Auble
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
If it is not .alleged in the petition that the contract was or was not in writing, and a general denial is filed, the plaintiff, upon trial, is required to sustain the issue by competent evidence, and the statute is available to the defendant by objection at the trial to oral evidence to prove the contract.
Birchell v. Neaster, 36 OS. 331.
In this case the petition expressly alleges that the contract sued upon was not in writing, and of course it was unnecessary for the defendant to plead the statute; and having filed a general denial, he did not waive the defense of the statute by not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Furth v. FarkaschOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bevin v. GriffithsOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- First City Trust & Savings Bank v. DoolittleOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hapsas Realty, Inc. v. McCounNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Warren v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Hapsas Realty, Inc. v. McCounNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.