Legal Opinion

McHugh v. Marshall

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1928No. 8475PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, PJ.

In order to determine the question it is necessary to examine the petition. We find upon analysis thereof that the vital averment is that on the 7th day of February, 1926, Margaret McHugh entered into an oral agreement with defendant, Marshall, whereby she was to furnish the defendant with prospective buyers for real estate which the defendant was selling, and that as the consideration thereof, defendant agreed to pay the plaintiff one-half of whatever commission that was received from the sale of property purchased by prospective buyers furnished by plaintiff. It was then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Furth v. FarkaschOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. P. J. Spitz Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Link-Hellmuth, Inc. v. CareyOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API