Legal Opinion
Martin v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 2, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-2203PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SLOMSKY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION .....................................255
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..............................................256
A. Three Generations of Ford Windstar Rear Axles.........................256
B. The Benteler Axle: Model Years 1998)4-2003 ............................259
1. Initial Testing....................................................259
2. Post-Test Monitoring.............................................260
C. Plaintiffs Ford Windstar..............................................261
D. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Investigation and…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Gonzalez v. CorningDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Sourovelis v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- DUKICH v. IKEA US RETAIL LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Derick Ortiz, v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.