Legal Opinion

Hendrix v. Alsop

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1971No. 85PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

We first consider the motion of defendant Pfizer and Roerig to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal.

The Court of Appeals unanimously, and we think correctly, affirmed Judge GambiH’s order of 6 March 1970, which dismissed the action as to Pfizer and Roerig.

On 6 April 1971 this Court refused to exercise its discretionary power of review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and denied plaintiff’s petition for certiorari.

G.S. 7A-30 provides:

§ 7A-30. Appeals of right from certain decisions of the Court of Appeals. — Except as provided in § 7A-28, [pertaining to post conviction hearings] from any decision…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Midler v. HeinowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Early v. EleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Gilchrist v. . KitchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Stancill and Gay v. . GaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. C.C. Walker Grading & Hauling, Inc. v. S.R.F. Management Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Webb v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. YencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API