Legal Opinion

State v. Yencer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2010No. COA09-1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

“A state may not delegate an important discretionary governmental power to a religious institution or share such power with a religious institution.” 1 Defendant Julie Anne Yencer argues that the trial court erred by denying her motion to dismiss because Davidson College is a religious institution to which a delegation of state police power is unconstitutional. Because we are bound by precedent in cases holding Campbell University and Pfeiffer University to be religious institutions, 2 we must likewise conclude that Davidson College is a religious institution for purposes of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Tilton v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. PendletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. YencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API