State v. Yencer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
“A state may not delegate an important discretionary governmental power to a religious institution or share such power with a religious institution.” 1 Defendant Julie Anne Yencer argues that the trial court erred by denying her motion to dismiss because Davidson College is a religious institution to which a delegation of state police power is unconstitutional. Because we are bound by precedent in cases holding Campbell University and Pfeiffer University to be religious institutions, 2 we must likewise conclude that Davidson College is a religious institution for purposes of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Edwards v. AguillardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Tilton v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. YENCERSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. YencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011