State v. Pleasant

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

Appellant Jeffrey Pleasant was initially charged with four counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices, a class two felony, in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2310. Appellant entered into a plea agreement wherein he agreed to plead guilty to counts one and two. The plea agreement stipulated that concurrent, sentences would be imposed and provided for the dismissal of counts three and four.

Subsequent to accepting the guilty plea, the court sentenced appellant to two con current terms of seven years’ imprisonment. The court also ordered appellant to pay $3,982.00 in restitution. It…